Dynamic Stability and Learning Rate Selection in Deep Neural Networks Using an Empirical Indicator

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59471/raia2026237

Keywords:

deep neural networks, dynamic stability, learning rate, optimization, hyperparameter selection

Abstract

Learning rate selection in deep neural networks is often based on empirical procedures that do not always provide a clear understanding of training dynamics or allow the search space to be reduced efficiently. This study analyzes such dynamics through an empirical stability indicator built from the temporal evolution of the loss function, used as a proxy for training sensitivity. The study combines dynamic analysis, predictive performance evaluation, and a comparison between traditional selection and a dynamic criterion. To this end, it examines the relationship among learning rate, relative stability, and performance in multilayer networks on MNIST and FashionMNIST, and then extends the analysis to architectures with varying depth, the CIFAR-10 dataset, different optimizers, a multi-dataset evaluation including tabular datasets, and a multi-seed validation. The results show that the learning rate systematically modifies the relative stability of training and that the best predictive performances tend to concentrate in intermediate regions of the indicator. In the multi-dataset experiments, the dynamic criterion reduced the search region by 30% to 60% while maintaining final performances comparable to those obtained through exhaustive exploration. Overall, the findings suggest that dynamic analysis can complement hyperparameter selection and provide a useful tool for studying learning stability in deep neural networks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Julio Paredes Rojas, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Argentina.

     

     

     

References

Bahri, Y., Kadmon, J., Pennington, J., Schoenholz, S. S., Sohl-Dickstein, J., & Ganguli, S. (2020). Statistical mechanics of deep learning. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 11, 501–528.

Barrett, D. G. T., & Dherin, B. (2021). Implicit gradient regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

Chaudhari, P., & Soatto, S. (2018). Stochastic gradient descent performs variational inference, converges to limit cycles for deep networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

Fort, S., & Scherlis, L. (2019). The Goldilocks zone: Towards better understanding of neural network loss landscapes. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), 357–364.

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.

Krizhevsky, A. (2009). Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images (Technical Report). University of Toronto.

Li, H., Xu, Z., Taylor, G., Studer, C., & Goldstein, T. (2018). Visualizing the loss landscape of neural nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 31).

Raghu, M., Gilmer, J., Yosinski, J., & Sohl-Dickstein, J. (2017). SVCCA: Singular vector canonical correlation analysis for deep learning dynamics and interpretability. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30).

Zhang, L., Feng, L., Chen, K., & Lai, C. H. (2024). Asymptotic edge of chaos as guiding principle for neural network training. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Research, 1(1), 2350001.

Ziyin, L., Li, B., Simon, J. B., & Ueda, M. (2022). SGD with a constant large learning rate can converge to local maxima. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

Published

2026-10-14

How to Cite

1.
Paredes Rojas J. Dynamic Stability and Learning Rate Selection in Deep Neural Networks Using an Empirical Indicator. Revista Abierta de Informática Aplicada [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 14 [cited 2026 Oct. 16];10(1). Available from: https://raia.revistasuai.ar/index.php/raia/article/view/237